What Works Best For You - 3 Square or 5 Small?
It is important as we evolve into healthier versions of ourselves to be continually open to dialog and even disagreement at about which health practices provide the best results.  I recently had to play referee between two women at the gym who go into a heated debate (thankfully neither resorted to use of their cardio kick combat skills) over eating three meals a day versus eating six meals a day for weight loss. I helped ease the tension by emphatically stating that they were both RIGHT.

Yes, both were right because they were reflecting on their firsthand experiences, eating preferences and the individual results they experienced. There is no “right” or “wrong”, and I have seen that both types of eating schedules can and do work for clients.  But, I should add, they only work IF the total calories consumed at the end of the day are less than the number of calories expended. This is a big IF and It is one we all need to be conscious and aware of as we go through our day.  

Eating 5-6 Meals A Day
Eating smaller meals is frequently recommended for weight loss due to the concept that the metabolism works more efficiently if you eat more frequently. It is also recommended because some feel that eating smaller meals at more frequent intervals prevents overeating. Those that oppose the “5-6 small meals” concept argue that there is no “metabolic” benefit to eating smaller meals more often and that it may even cause weight gain due to underestimating the actual calories in the “mini meals”.

Eating 3 Meals A Day
The proponents of three square meals a day argue that people underestimate the “snack” calories they are consuming and that “grazing” on smaller meals throughout the day is counter productive. It has also been argued that three meals a day are easier to plan the caloric intake and portion control of the day as well as providing a socially standardized eating regime that allows for shared meals.  

When determining what works best for us, I feel our energy is best spent observing and listening to our own bodies closely. We can all learn from the successful practices of others, but ultimately, we are responsible for our weight and waistline. So maybe the question shouldn’t be five small or three square? Maybe it should be do you accept responsibility for what you choose to consume and how you choose to move?  By accepting this responsibility you will become more in tune with this wonderful and healthy thing called you!





Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Digg! Reddit! Del.icio.us! Mixx! Google! Live! Facebook! StumbleUpon! Yahoo! Twitter! Free Joomla PHP extensions, software, information and tutorials.
Trackback(0)
Comments (3)Add Comment
...
written by okiorp, May 21, 2009
I like Rainie and Mike http://www.frogmix.com/search/Rainie+and+Mike better!!!!!!!!! they had this certain chemistry that if you see them together there is an instant conection between the two of them…. though I like hebe too but she is not that too good for mike he….. I have’nt finish bullfighting……. But I can say its a good series…..
I stick with 3 meals a day
written by Lakeisha, August 02, 2010
Because my body doesn't like 3 meals a day. When I tried the 5-6 meals a day way of eating it felt like I was forcing myself to eat at times that I wasn't hungry. So I would end up skipping the snacks in between anyways. When I went back to eating 3 square meals a day, I felt a lot better and less hurried. So basically, to lose weight I eat 1500-1600 calories a day. 500 each for breakfast, lunch, and dinner and if I need extra calories I can add a couple to each meal. Now this has been working for me; my metabolism is increasing and I'm losing the pounds. So I'm guessing this debate about 3meals vs. 5-6 small meals a day, is more of what works for that pacific person.
Mis-wrote in my first posting
written by Lakeisha, August 02, 2010
Sorry I mis-wrote. My body doesn't like 6 meals a day.

Write comment

busy